A thousand patriots showed up in Brussels, in the wake of recent terrorist attacks, to oppose the far-left peaceniks (appeaseniks?) who, as always, turned out to give aid and comfort to the enemy. That’s what the peace-and-love crowd always do, whether they admit it or not. By advocating “peace” and condemning those who see a very real threat in Islam and mass immigration, they are in effect the propaganda arm of Islam and of the globalists.
The patriot protesters reportedly did nothing more than chanting at the far-left mobs, but the police saw fit to turn water cannons on them, and use batons or nightsticks on them.
By now, the controlled media, present to cover the “peace” rally, were busy sending news wire stories out saying that “neo-Nazis” had come to the rally and were making “Nazi salutes” (even though the photographic evidence shows nothing of the sort, with the only symbols being made of clenched fists and the well-known two-armed chant pose of the “casuals”).
Then the police were given the order to attack the patriots, and moved in with riot police, batons, and water cannon. A handful of the patriots fought back against this totally unwarranted and excessive police action, and about a dozen were arrested in the ensuing melee.”
It should be obvious by now that there is some kind of de facto global regime, though there is still a pretense made that countries still have some sovereignty. It is funny that the response from law enforcement authorities is the same whenever leftists and/or nonwhites go up against White patriotic or ‘right-wing’ groups. It is the White or ”right-wing” side which is always deemed the instigator, the bad guys, the ones to be beaten and arrested, while the left, with or without their nonwhite mascots, are always given more leeway if not outright protected by the police. Doesn’t this hint that the law enforcement policies are meant to protect certain groups of people while punishing others just ‘on principle’? There is no even-handedness, even when one side is clearly the aggressor.
And even worse is the blatant bias of the controlled media when reporting these kinds of events. Katie Hopkins castigates the media for their mendacity and obvious prejudices. She also takes to task the ragtag-and-bobtail far left for their siding with the invaders and terrorists.
“In Cologne, 150 officers were sent to police the migrant attacks on women on New Years Eve, resulting in 676 criminal complaints being filed. In comparison, 1700 riot police with water cannon were sent to stop a subsequent Pegida march through the city.
Whilst it seems perfectly acceptable to turn the water cannon on nationals, determined to stand up for their country and culture, it is never acceptable to criticise migrants, terrorists or extremists planning attacks.
It seems to me there is a yawning gulf between the treatment and reporting of the far-left and the far-right, and and even bigger chasm between nationals and migrant populations, who lack respect for the culture they have joined.
The left are so busy kowtowing to the rights of those who have chosen to join our culture, the right has lost the freedom to defend the culture they have chosen to join.”
There aren’t many like Katie Hopkins in the media; what she says is just plain obvious truth, and it says a lot (none of it good) about our society that there are so few people willing — or able — to say it.