What about the American dream?

In the early days of blogging I remember writing about the ‘American dream’, and how the idea of it became somehow confused with immigration. There were many articles in the controlled media about how immigrants were compelled to come here because of their lack of material goods, compared to our excess. And the idea was emphasized that the ‘American Dream’, immigrant-style, was about acquiring ”stuff” and owning a house with a yard.

Now? It seems many Americans are supposed to consider themselves lucky to live in a barracks-style facility, with an open plan, and little privacy. In the staggeringly expensive cities, housing is scarce and many people work for low wages, as rentals become increasingly expensive. It’s hard to make ends meet on a barista’s earnings, or a less-than-full-time office drone job.

Take a look at this example of housing in San Francisco’s Tenderloin, at $60 a night, or $1,200 a month. The most obvious question is: with an open plan, how can this be a co-ed facility? What about privacy? How many of us would be comfortable with sleeping in close proximity to strangers, minus barriers or enclosures? What with the prevalence of, say, bedbugs in even four-star hotels (so we read, or hear) how will that kind of problem be prevented or dealt with? And what with the return of communicable diseases that were once eradicated, is communal housing hygienically desirable?

However, the definite scarcity of housing compels a lot of Americans to make choices they would not have made, not so long ago. Now there’s a lack of housing — a lack of housing for the low-wage or medium-income worker can afford. This forces a lot of people to settle for the lack of amenities, and the cramped quarters.

I notice that some people believe the housing issue is a problem only for people in the overcrowded cities, but in smaller communities there is a market, apparently, for those tiny little sheds that are being sold as actual homes, though they appear hardly large enough for a bed and a table, and what about indoor plumbing? About four miles away from me is a ‘community’ of little cabins, very roughly put together, apparently built by or for people who have been priced out of the rental market.

Are people now going to become inured to a much lower standard of living, to be housed either in rabbit warrens, or ‘pod’ dwellings, or in those ‘capsule’ style high-rises as in Japan? Will single people without the means for a real dwelling be content to live in shed-like houses, such as those being offered by the roadside now?

The city denizens excepted, many of us grew up with a concept of the wide-open spaces, and a horizon that stretched on forever. Does anyone remember an old song called ‘Don’t Fence Me In’? The lyrics speak of “land, lots of land, ‘neath the starry skies above….”

Now what with the ever-decreasing wages for many working Americans, and the skyrocketing housing costs, the old American dream of a roomy house with a nice yard, and two (at least) cars in the garage is receding into the long-ago past. If present trends continue our standard of living will decline as we have no choice but to downsize and lower our hopes and expectations. Are we “too spoiled”, as our moral betters keep telling us, and are we expected to atone for our past sins as a ‘spoiled people’?

I am sure there will always be those who prosper. It’s “an ill wind that blows nobody any good,” as the old proverb says. But it would seem that the standard of living, for the common people, will likely decline in the near term. And our quality of life is already diminishing.

And I need not explain just why our standard of living is suffering.

I do hope I’m wrong. I don’t want to see people living in modified dog houses, or crammed into high-priced tenement houses in cities; what a contrast to the life we knew not so very long ago. Material things are not the be-all and the end-all; we can only hope that we learn to appreciate the non-material good things of life.

4 thoughts on “What about the American dream?

  1. Hello Bonnyblue

    There is no room for the kids in a rabbit cage.
    Take a look at Tokyo’s birthrate.

    All the “migrants” given housing subsidies and increased housing demand that come with rapid population expansion squeeze out “old stocks”.

    The next generation of whites is hardly being produced. They are being set up to fail.
    Affordable family formation is the lifeblood of a nation. The people who control the finance system are making it hard for real Americans and Europeans. Whites do need to learn healthy regenerate ethics. Love ,not neglect of what is good in their people.

    The Home is just so important.

    Robert David Putnam “Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis”


    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks to you, too, Puritan for your comments. You make some importaint points. The system as it is now seems designed to work just as you say, to limit reproduction from young Whites. And helping this process along is this men-vs-women thing. Many of the Gen-Xers I know well and have known for years have never married or had children, and for the women it’s too late now. However in smaller towns with more Christians the young folk usually marry pretty young and have children (3 or 4 at least) at a younger age. So there may be hope there as long as the unhealthy trends slow down if they don’t reverse.

      As you also mention, Japan and esp. big cities have so many single young people who will likely never marry for the same reasons as our young population.

      BTW, off topic but I am still doing some work towards another post on the Puritan story. I haven’t forgotten. It seems the time gets away from me.


      • They make it hard to have kids which results in an aging population. Then they use that as an excuse to import more young alien workers. Housing price goes up and the cycle gets worse and worse. Then you lose your country by means of democracy.

        The best and brightest move to the cities for job opportunities and by the time they are ready to start families they are haggard.

        “Wage slave Quarters” would be an appropriate name for these apartments.

        Some Puritan dreams

        Harvard and Yale become Puritan again instead of hostiles mocking who they were.
        Whats left of the religious right learn moral courage and cultural exceptionalism from the Puritans.
        Rein in media violence and smut .

        The Puritans had a real charm to them if you take the time to investigate.
        They had no real betters in America to this day.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Puritan, thanks for your comments. I agree with much of what you say. It seems the people who have a favorable word to say about the Puritans are few and far between.
    In going through some family tree information I see that I had a Southron ancestor who came to Virginia from England, and he was in fact a Puritan. There were Puritans in the South in the colonial days, so the popular stereotype of Southrons=Cavaliers, Puritans=Yankees/New Englanders is very oversimplified, hence not accurate.
    There were also some Quakers who eventually settled in the South, not many I think, but they were far more ”liberal” than the Puritans are accused of being.

    Actually as you are aware, the Puritans were more conservative, but only became more ‘liberal’ when they began to lose their Biblical worldview and became influenced by the Enlightenment and its humanism.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s