“No one man can depart from the truth without damage to himself; no one million of men, no twenty-seven Millions of men.”-Thomas Carlyle
Are people becoming more susceptible to the media wormtongues whispering in our ears? Or is it peer pressure, wherein everybody is part of a group mind, from which no one wants to deviate?
Over the last 24 hours when watching the coverage of ‘events’ in our cities, I keep hearing this mantra that White antifa are really the masterminds and the leaders of these ‘events.’ I hear that it has nothing to do with race, though why are BLM involved if that’s the case? In all it seems that I am hearing more and more people deflecting blame and absolving people committing violence. Are people that fearful of Truth? Or just of the consequences of speaking that Truth?
Someone, and I can’t remember the source, unfortunately, said that much of what we consider opinion or principle on the part of many people is nothing more than fashion or fad. People are followers in our society, for the most part, and maybe that’s true of all societies, but I sometimes wonder if these changes of public opinion over time are in large part just fashion. It’s “in” to try to understand everyone else’s viewpoint and it’s been popular for decades now to do amateur psychoanalysis of people’s motives and inward feelings. It’s very ‘in’ to forgive everybody who does wrong and to show off how understanding and ”nonjudgmental” we are. Remember all those parents whose children were murdered, who publicly announced that they forgave the murderers of their flesh and blood. How unnatural is this? It’s becoming commonplace.
Some of this is peer pressure; it feels good to be regarded highly according to today’s ‘morality’. But where are these counterfeit morals coming from? Mostly from the media, but even people who don’t imbibe the media narrative get it second-hand from the world around us, from the society of other people. And we are now seeing a whole new crop of “conservatives”, Republican or independent, who have absorbed a lot of the ‘progressive’ belief system. If you converse with them about current events they sound little different from the ‘moderate’ liberal, with the characteristic feminine way of regarding things, full of maudlin sentiment for those they think are underdogs or the Oppressed.
There is a video going around that has a lot of ‘liberal Republicans’ in tears; it shows a young mixed-race man crying and hugging a White policeman. We don’t know the context of the picture; it could actually be a really heartwarming scenario, but everyone projects what they wish the story to be; apparently the people who shed tears over the video see the two races reconciling and embracing their brotherhood. I’m not hard-hearted enough to disparage that, but the reaction to it shows ambivalence on the part of White viewers. They may be realists in some ways but they still seem to yearn to be “forgiven” and absolved by other ethnicities, all of whom are said to be victims. Remember those pictures from years ago, when some churches had Southrons put on yokes or chains, get on their knees, and beg forgiveness from blacks? Some of the Whites seemed to relish it.
All I can see is that this same sort of guilt-ridden people are now happy to blame current troubles on White troublemakers (Antifa — who are leftist, anarchists, nihilists, or just plain antisocial/antiwhite) or — even more outlandishly, WNs, who seem to be pretty thin on the ground these days, after being denounced and practically outlawed by Trump, by Congress, and by the usual ‘respectables’ who want to preserve their social acceptability. In other words, the blame-deflectors are the ones who are fashion-followers, and just now universal non-judgmentalism is in fashion. Except that European-descended people are always under judgment.
By the way, how is it that according to the media and their leftist partners, this is a ‘White supremacist’ country — and yet it is demographically becoming more and more “diverse”? Surely evil White supremacists would, well, ensure their own dominance? Isn’t that what ‘supremacy’ means? Why would supremacists be OK with accelerating the demographic turnover in America? They would be absolute failures at supremacism if they were in charge and would, at the very least, be the laughingstock, or the recipients of abuse by any genuine ‘supremacists’, if such exist.
According to these narrative-spinners who have very lively imaginations, the President and any who voted for him are ‘WNs’, though they’ve all disavowed it and practically issued an anathema on anyone of that inclination. But truth be told, if they are to condemn moderate, middle-of-the-road Republicans of holding pro-White opinions, they are in effect condemning and cursing every single generation since this country began, at least those who were around before the Civil Rights revolution was effected. All prior generations were pro-White and they were realists about HBD and about human nature.
Ever since then our folk have been losing IQ points or becoming more willfully blind to those factors. In a cowardly fashion they rush to grasp at any explanation which leaves out the ethnic/racial factor. They make up silly lies like “it’s Democrats doing this”, hoping they can escape being called the inevitable names and having their reputation damaged. I think they actually think that being a Democrat carries a greater influence than genetics plus culture.
And yes, Democrats have become insufferable and blindly fanatical. But politics does not outweigh heredity and culture.
I hate to belabor the Q movement but Q himself constantly preaches a colorblind, multicult, paper American gospel, and I think he influences a great many confused liberal-republicans. Our folk can’t continue to live by lies. And Q’s “unity” can’t be found at the expense of truth. The truth is not and cannot be politically correct. Yet it’s essential to our future, if any.