Realism vs. Republican political correctness

See this thread from Free Republic, that playground of the clueless ‘conservative.’ You’ll see there a recent arrival, a Freeper with the screen name Lucy Hamilton, who is arguing nature vs. nurture, crossing swords with a Freeper called ‘volunteer’ who is full of indignation at her outspoken political incorrectness.

The news story under discussion has to do with skyrocketing poverty in Africa (what else is new?), and ‘volunteer’ insists that the poverty is a result of “the culture” there. Some of you out there will remember that I used to stress the point that the people make the culture, not vice-versa. It’s exasperating that as the years go by, the politically correct ”right” still insists, in the face of mountains of evidence, that ”culture” makes the people. But where does culture come from?

The mantra ”it’s the culture; it’s nothing to do with race!” is the shield for the PC; it is used as an invocation to protect from accusations of ‘racism.’ The thing is it doesn’t work. And it’s dishonest.

I expect the mods at Free Republic to lock the linked thread soon if forbidden common sense is being displayed there. Egalitarianism is the implicit religion of most Americans, be they Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, or other.

An encouraging sign

It looks as though there are some signs of life in the South, where the Flag is concerned.
I am somewhat surprised that Virginia is the scene of these efforts to preserve the Confederate Battle Flag. I say that because it seems that Virginia has been targeted especially for demographic transformation, what with many immigrants from Asia and elsewhere settling (or being settled) in that state. And let’s not forget the effect of having many Northern newcomers who are at best, indifferent to Southern history and heritage, if not downright hostile.

To get an idea of the political situation in the Old Dominion, just consider the fact that the governor is Terry McAuliffe, popularly known by some as Terry McAwful, from his Clinton-minion days. How did that happen? Is Virginia that liberal? Evidently so.

Nevertheless, we have to take our encouragement where we find it. Kudos to the flaggers. I hope they don’t yield to the temptation to apologize for the Flag, ever. It’s the flag of our fathers. It represents our heritage and our history, and history is not something that can be erased or altered for political reasons. Nor can it be cast into the memory hole by the arbitrary dictates of one man or a few ideologues with politically correct agendas.

No. Just no.

It seems somebody at ultra-leftist National Public Radio commissioned a design for a new ‘Confederate’ flag, one that would be an acceptable (to the South-hating left) alternative to the ‘bigoted, racist‘ old flag, the Confederate Battle Flag.

You can see the pictures at the link above; I attempted to upload an image of the flag — which is not even esthetically pleasing in my opinion — but couldn’t upload it.

The far-lefties who populate NPR  and the rest of the media for that matter, feel they have the right to tell Southrons what their own flag, and the flag of their/our fathers, represents or means. And what’s worse, they feel they have the right to decree that the flag must come down everywhere because somebody somewhere was taught that the flag was ‘offensive’ to them, that it represents ‘hatred’ and ‘subjugation.’ Do the clients of these cultural Marxist grievance-merchants even understand the word ‘subjugation’?

The Southron folk certainly learned the meaning of subjugation during the dark days of the Reconstruction era in the South. It seems that the schools and the media conceal the history concerning that time period, with the result that far too few people have even heard of Reconstruction and the South under occupation by Northern overlords, corrupt officials, scalawags and carpetbaggers. The Southron people were then knowingly exposed to being targets of those seeking revenge and payback. The freeing of slaves coincided with the stripping of property and rights from White people. The latter were targets of violence, and had no help from the corrupt occupation authorities, what with scalawags and ‘freedmen’ left to do as they would.

Even the ‘conservative’ White people of today seem as ignorant of Reconstruction as the far-leftists and their clients. Nobody is left, it seems to speak up for the South and educate the average American. If these people knew history, they might just recognize the parallels between the Reconstruction era and today’s events. Back in the Reconstruction days, the North and their hirelings were hell-bent on teaching the South a lesson, determined not for the sake of creating some kind of fair play or ‘equality’ but rather to invert the social order, with the motley assortment of carpetbaggers, scalawags, and freedmen lording it, vengefully, over the Whites.

Today it’s the same, with the same thirst for humiliating the South, bringing the South to its knees, and making it repent of its supposed sins and crimes. And the real degradation is that Southrons are being made to ritualistically renounce their past, their heritage, their honored symbols, their heroes, and to adopt the Jacobin ideas of their former foes.

There is no need for a new flag. The old flag is the one our forefathers (my great-great-grandfather, for one) died under. That flag has a history and a meaning. It was the symbol of a people, a country, and a way of life that had much that was good and worthy and honorable, the left’s lies notwithstanding. To abandon our symbols and our history, or to kowtow to political correctness, is to give in to the final conquest of our folk and the destruction of the old South.

No. Just no.

A ‘hello’ to Google/Blogger

To my friends at Google/Blogger: Yes, I have logged in again, using a Firefox-based browser, under my usual IP, and the same operating system.

Of course now I expect another e-mail from Google,  informing me of my login, and telling me that the e-mails are ‘mandatory’ and for my own security, lest somebody log in in my name.

I wonder why my former blog domain was allowed, then, to be taken over by Asian spammers, if there is such concern about someone potentially hijacking blogs?

And do others who blog on Blogger get e-mails from you every time they log in, or am I one of a lucky few?

Anyway, thanks for your concern, but it really is not necessary to e-mail me every time I log in.


Ted Cruz and 25 other Republicans have come out with anti-‘racist’, Social Justice rhetoric, denouncing the Smithsonian’s display of a bust of Margaret Sanger. Why? Because she founded Planned Parenthood, which now champions abortion in all its repugnant forms? No, because she was a ‘Racist’ who wanted to commit ‘genocide’ against blacks, purportedly.

Obviously the left can’t point a finger at one of its feminist heroes, the woman who founded Planned Parenthood, so they have a dilemma when it comes to addressing her alleged ‘racism’ and desire to eliminate black people. But did she advocate genocide, as these Republican SJW wannabees are insisting?

The fact is she didn’t even advocate abortion. She actually spoke against it. As here:

She turned women seeking abortions away from her clinics: “I do not approve of abortion.” She called it “sordid,” “abhorrent,” “terrible,” “barbaric,” a “horror.” She called abortionists “blood-sucking men with MD after their names who perform operations for the price of so-and-so.” She called the results of abortion “an outrageous slaughter,” “infanticide,” “foeticide,” and “the killing of babies.” And Margaret Sanger, who knew a thing or two about contraception, said that birth control “has nothing to do with abortion, it has nothing to do with interfering with or disturbing life after conception has taken place.” 

But as to these persistent claims that she was a ‘racist’ and had genocidal wishes, I could not find a direct quote in which she advocated such a thing. She certainly advocated birth control for blacks but she also believed that other groups, such as those popularly called ”White trash” (though she didn’t use that term) should practice birth control, limiting family size. She also believed that people who were considered “feeble-minded” should be kept from having children. But I found no writings of Sanger’s that proved the veracity of the ‘racist and genocidalist’ claims.

The nearest thing I’ve found is this quote:

The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Now the way I read that paragraph is that she is saying she wants to pre-empt any fears on the part of black folk, any fear that she might be out to ‘exterminate’ them. Does anyone seriously believe that if she had such designs, that she would make a public statement like the one quoted above, words which are now being interpreted as proof that she did, in fact, have ‘genocidal’ ideas?

Do people today believe that Sanger and other prominent public figures of her era supported ‘genocide’ against blacks? Really? Seriously? To believe that is to have swallowed whole the leftist propaganda about how evil and racist people of earlier times were. The world of the past, for the race-obsessed left and for many minorities, is a world teeming with evil, sinister racists (White racists, needless to say — because all Whites are racists from birth) who would stop at nothing, people with no morals or ethics or humanity. This is a warped and false view of White society of the past. And now here we have Republicans, people who make a token pretense of being ‘conservative’, joining in the hue and cry of the left, finding racists under every bed and in every dark corner. Talk about witch hunts. Joining in the effort to sniff out ‘racism’ everywhere is just another way of defaming White people, because it implies strongly that White racism is in fact an ever-present menace. The implicit message is that White people are not to be trusted; they must be monitored and chastised if they show any telltale signs that they carry the disease of ‘racism.’

These aspersions being cast against White people in general amount to defamation, and they perpetuate the image of Whites as irredeemably hateful, whether openly or covertly. In Christian terms, careless tale-bearing often means ”bearing false witness.”

As for Margaret Sanger? I’m just as horrified as anyone can be about the Planned Parenthood scandals. I am not an apologist for them or for any pro-abort group. I don’t support infanticide under whatever name.

But I think it’s questionable whether she had genocidal designs or whether she ‘hated’ black folk, if that is in fact what constitutes a ‘racist.’

It’s known and established fact that she worked with people from what is now described as the black community, leaders like W.E.B. DuBois. Would a genocidal hater of blacks form such associations? Or was DuBois duped by Sanger? That seems doubtful. But here we have a quote form DuBois which has been misattributed to Sanger — probably knowingly.

• A quote usually taken out of context, and which was from W.E.B. duBois instead of Sanger: “The mass of ignorant Negroes still breed carelessly and disastrously, so that the increase among Negroes, even more than the increase among whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit, and least able to rear their children properly.”

So I suppose DuBois would then be a genocidalist racist — against his own race, which is not likely. He was a defender of his own folk but not an apologist for any shortcomings of his people, as is the case today with such leaders.

Another misunderstanding of Sanger’s words centers around her use of terms like ‘racial betterment.’ P.S. to those who are not familiar with the word usages of the past: when people spoke of ‘the race’ back then, they generally meant the human race collectively, homo sapiens sapiens, not any particular color or ethnic group, as the usage is today — though today ‘race’ is just a social construct.

But as to the politics of this particular ‘controversy’, isn’t it enough that the left-wing mass media constantly trumpets accusations of racism for every ill-chosen word on the part of some hapless White somewhere, and that the left has completely destroyed the character of many of our heroes of the past, with their never-ending accusations and slanders? Must we now have supposed ‘conservatives’, even those who trade on a patriotic image, becoming race-baiters too?

Behold, Ted Cruz, darling of many of the PC Republicans, as a social justice warrior.
The game seems to be to position Republicans as the real friends and defenders of black and other minority folk. The Democrats are the ‘‘real racists” and the Republicans are climbing over each other to be more anti-racist and pro-minority than the Democrats.

If these poseurs, these Politically Correct Preeners, really cared about a group of people whose numbers are dwindling, a group of people whose birth rate is scarcely at replacement level, a people who are in a real existential crisis, why aren’t they championing and defending their own people, the people to whom they are related by genetics and heritage? The people who constitute most of their contributors and constituents?

These people are not patriots in the real sense of the world. If one is not a patriot to his people, he is no patriot at all.

Still, somebody in the GOP hierarchy must have decided that this posturing and race-baiting is a good political strategy, that it will draw black voters (who voted something like 97% Democrat in the last presidential election) into the GOP. Good luck with that. No, it’s only clueless Whites in both parties who think it’s cool and profitable to neglect — and defame — one’s own folk and pander to everyone else.

Political correctness is on the offensive

Another Columbus Day gone by, amid the usual protests and grievance-fests. I wouldn’t be surprised if this  might be the last ‘Columbus Day; observance, given the complete intolerance on the part of the PC brigade. Columbus Day will probably become ‘Indigenous Peoples Day’, as the perpetually aggrieved masses demand.

Or perhaps it will the El Dia de la Raza, as HBD Chick says.

And now, the “Social Justice Warriors’ and their clients and mascots are feeling their oats over the recent victories in the disputes over the Confederate Battle Flag. The church shootings recently constituted an opportunity for the PC crowd; it seemed almost made to order, both for the anti-Second Amendment agitators, and for the anti-Confederate anti-Whites. Now it seems they are going from strength to strength, as the number of unreconstructed Southrons seems to dwindle day to day. Where are the defenders of the Battle Flag? As of now, I don’t know of any blogs who champion the Southron cause unequivocally. The ‘Rainbow Confederates’ are running scared, afraid of being called bigots and racists, and bend over backwards to be ‘inclusive’ and to prove their innocence of the thought-crime called ‘racism.’ Some bloggers have said the Rainbow Confederates have had an epiphany, but where’s the evidence? Who is speaking up? Who is championing the cause of our heritage, our history, our forefathers? Does anyone care?

I am losing my faith in the people of the South; as the older generations pass on, the younger generations, who in general are much more liberal and uninformed about history than their elder, are not interested for the most part in carrying on traditions and honouring our past. The past has got to be jettisoned, say some; we need new symbols, created out of whole cloth, symbols with no ‘baggage’, symbols that might help us dodge the accusations of ‘hate’ and ‘bigotry.’ But is this the answer? I say an unequivocal ‘no.’

If creating new symbols, a new flag for example, enables us to dodge the stigma that has been attached to our historical flags, it is because a new flag has no meaning, no history behind it. Such invented symbols, then, lack anything to inspire Southron folk. They have no historical associations, no content, no sentimental meaning, nothing to connect us with the generations of great men and women who went before us.

Certain people on the ethnopatriot side also want to jettison Christianity and adopt some fabricated religion as a means to an end. But one can’t invent a religion just out of thin air. (L. Ron Hubbard did that, and the result was Scientology.) A religion has to be based on Truth, and can’t be cooked up as from a recipe book.
People will not sacrifice themselves in the cause of something that was concocted yesterday.

The crowning humiliation for the South is the malicious idea of topping Stone Mountain in Georgia with a monument to MLK. This is brazen triumphalism, meant to plant a metaphorical foot on the neck of traditional Southron people. It’s a way of spitting on our ancestors, especially considering that the mountain has a monument to the Confederacy, featuring the great General Robert E. Lee.

Now the much-repeated ‘I Have a Dream’ speech will be featured on the new monument. MLK is now something of a deified figure, above criticism and reproach, while our Confederate ancestors and kinsmen are vilified and their monuments pulled down, along with the Confederate Battle Flag. Soon they will be non-persons, their names and images erased from public view, or else their corpses will be metaphorically dragged out of their graves so that they can be condemned over and over again. Victimhood demands villains to be spat upon; many White people don’t yet understand (will they ever?) that the perpetual pity party of the ‘Victims’ requires villains to be ritualistically spat upon. This is what’s happening now, with the media whipping the Professional Victim groups into a frenzy over supposed past wrongs, alleged wrongs which were never suffered by anybody today, nor perpetrated by anybody who is alive today. But that doesn’t matter; you and I, kinsmen, are the villains, the oppressors. So say the mobs protesting Columbus Day and the Battle Flag and the Confederate Monuments. We have sinned, through our ancestors; a price is being exacted. Where and when will it end?

And yet we have our White Judases, happy to side with those accusing them and their forebears. None of this would be happening without the collusion of the Social Justice Warriors of the left, and the politically correct lickspittles on the ”right”, and I mean the GOP faithful, and many of the Free Republic MLK fan club, and the people who make up the so-called ‘New South’, eager to bury the Old South.

White people who turn on their kinsmen and who dishonor their own forefathers are a disgrace; I despair of their ever seeing the light — especially those of the class of people called ‘journalists’. Without our renegade media, the left and their minority mascots would not be doing their little triumphalist victory dance on the grave of those great Confederate gentlemen now.

Next, someday soon,  will be the blasting of the images of General Lee and his soldiers off the Mountain.
Shame. Shame on all those connected with this. But such people are impervious to shame.

"Multiculturalism is a failure" she said

Just about five years ago, Madame Merkel was going around making speeches declaring multiculturalism to be a failure. Anybody remember that? I do.

“Multikulti”, the concept that “we are now living side by side and are happy about it,” does not work, Merkel told a meeting of younger members of her conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party at Potsdam near Berlin.
“This approach has failed, totally,” she said, adding that immigrants should integrate and adopt Germany’s culture and values.

At the time I remember blogging about it rather skeptically, seeing this declaration as a cynical ploy to mollify immigration critics, and somehow it seemed to fool a lot of people on the “right”. There were a number of articles and blog pieces hailing Merkel and the other Western leaders (like Cameron, who made the rounds spouting the same talking points, as did the then-Prime Minister of Australia, among others)  for their supposed epiphany. It seems my viewpoint was not a popular one then; people took Merkel and the rest at face value. As if they are trustworthy; as if they are anything but dyed-in-the-wool ideologues who are in office to further the globalist, multicult agenda above all, and to preside over the slow, lingering death of the West, of former Christendom.

When Merkel et al pronounced multiculturalism officially ‘dead’, they did not mean that the demographic tide, the forced transformation of Europe and the West was going to be turned back or reversed. Far from it. And they made little attempt to pretend otherwise. In the years since the ‘multiculturalism is a failure’ act, stories came out in which European leaders announced matter-of-factly that something like 50 million Africans were expected to come to Europe in the near future. People like arch-globalist Peter Sutherland talked openly about ‘undermining’ the homogeneity of the European peoples.

So when these European puppet leaders blather about the ‘failure of multiculturalism’, notice that they speak of the necessity of integration. Now that may sound good to the unthinking masses, especially Americans who have been taught that integration is a double-plus-good thing because separation of any kind is double-plus-ungood. But former French leader Nicolas Sarkozy was more explicit when he lectured the French people about the imperative to mix with the ‘newcomers’ — metissage was the word he used. The ethnicities and races must mix, mate, blend together, he indicated, until any distinctions were insignificant.

If multiculturalism is to be replaced by ‘integration’, it means that the peoples of Europe will be genetically mixed out of existence, along with their traditions and way of life. The historic peoples of Europe will be overwhelmed and lost. What price ‘diversity’ then, when whole ethnies will be submerged in the tidal waves from the Third World?

Ethnopatriots ‘get it.’ At least I hope they do; no thinking person should be fooled by these European ‘leaders’ and their forked tongues. But it seems there are still some ‘conservatives’ who still haven’t grasped what’s happening.  Some of these people, the Republican loyalist types, are actually rejoicing at Germany’s distress, or gloating that we in this country are in better shape than the hapless Europeans. Think again. The West is already under a monolithic globalist leadership, but for now we are allowed to have a pretense of independent governments, or ‘elected’ officials who are supposedly subject to the will of the people. But if we look at the people behind the curtain, it’s obvious that there is an overarching agenda and plan that is being put into effect, more rapidly of late. Is it too late to stop the globalist juggernaut?

The ‘refugee’ crisis

The following e-mail, from a doctor in Germany, was transcribed by a Czech television host and read aloud to the viewers. The subject is the ‘refugee’ flood which is now engulfing parts of Europe:

Eyewitness from a Munich hospital:

    A friend in Prague has a friend, who, as a retired physician, had returned to work at a Munich area hospital where they needed an anaesthesiologist. I correspond with her and she forwarded me her email. Yesterday, at the hospital we had a meeting about how the situation here and at the other Munich hospitals is unsustainable. Clinics cannot handle emergencies, so they are starting to send everything to the hospitals.

    Many Muslims are refusing treatment by female staff and, we, women, are refusing to go among those animals, especially from Africa. Relations between the staff and migrants are going from bad to worse. Since last weekend, migrants going to the hospitals must be accompanied by police with K-9 units.

    Many migrants have AIDS, syphilis, open TB and many exotic diseases that we, in Europe, do not know how to treat them. If they receive a prescription in the pharmacy, they learn they have to pay cash. This leads to unbelievable outbursts, especially when it is about drugs for the children. They abandon the children with pharmacy staff with the words: “So, cure them here yourselves!” So the police are not just guarding the clinics and hospitals, but also large pharmacies.

    Truly we said openly: Where are all those who had welcomed in front of TV cameras, with signs at train stations?! Yes, for now, the border has been closed, but a million of them are already here and we will definitely not be able to get rid of them.

    Until now, the number of unemployed in Germany was 2.2 million. Now it will be at least 3.5 million. Most of these people are completely unemployable. A bare minimum of them have any education. What is more, their women usually do not work at all. I estimate that one in ten is pregnant. Hundreds of thousands of them have brought along infants and little kids under six, many emaciated and neglected. If this continues and German re-opens its borders, I’m going home to the Czech Republic. Nobody can keep me here in this situation, not even double the salary than at home. I went to Germany, not to Africa or the Middle East.

    Even the professor who heads our department told us how sad it makes him to see the cleaning woman, who for 800 Euros cleans every day for years, and then meets young men in the hallways who just wait with their hand outstretched, want everything for free, and when they don’t get it they throw a fit.

    I really don’t need this! But I’m afraid that if I return, that at some point it will be the same in the Czech Republic. If the Germans, with their nature cannot handle this, there in Czechia it would be total chaos. Nobody who has not come in contact with them has no idea what kind of animals they are, especially the ones from Africa, and how Muslims act superior to our staff, regarding their religious accommodation.

    For now, the local hospital staff has not come down with the diseases they brought here, but, with so many hundreds of patients every day – this is just a question of time.

    In a hospital near the Rhine, migrants attacked the staff with knives after they had handed over an 8-month-old on the brink of death, which they had dragged across half of Europe for three months. The child died in two days, despite having received top care at one of the best pediatric clinics in Germany. The physician had to undergo surgery and two nurses are laid up in the ICU. Nobody has been punished.

    The local press is forbidden to write about it, so we know about it through email. What would have happened to a German if he had stabbed a doctor and nurses with a knife? Or if he had flung his own syphilis-infected urine into a nurse’s face and so threatened her with infection? At a minimum he’d go straight to jail and later to court. With these people – so far, nothing has happened.

    And so I ask, where are all those greeters and receivers from the train stations? Sitting pretty at home, enjoying their non-profits and looking forward to more trains and their next batch of cash from acting like greeters at the stations. If it were up to me I would round up all these greeters and bring them here first to our hospital’s emergency ward, as attendants. Then, into one building with the migrants so they can look after them there themselves, without armed police, without police dogs who today are in every hospital here in Bavaria, and without medical help.”

The e-mail speaks for itself, and the facts in it are not surprising. In fact, my first thought upon reading the first few paragraphs was that it sounds not unlike what the border states in our country have been experiencing for years, including the appearance and spread of diseases not known previously, or diseases which had been thought to be extinct here.

And I see that post #20 by ‘Jourdan’ on this Vox Day blog thread says something very similar to my thoughts.

Yet so many Americans who can clearly see the dangers to Europe from mass influxes of ‘refugees’ or ‘migrants’ think that we, here in the States, are sitting pretty because ‘at least the Mexicans are Christian’, and somebody on Free Republic reassures us that ‘at least most Mexicans are White.’

Europe is in more immediate peril because of its relatively small geographical area and the fact that they are geographically nearer to the ‘feeder’ countries of Africa and the Middle East. But we are not any less threatened by this forced demographic/racial transformation than the Europeans.

Some of the best writing on the immigration crisis and the coerced ‘diversifying’ of the countries of former Christendom is found at the Council of European Canadians. This piece by Clare Ellis is highly recommended.

A coat of Whitewash

There are accusations that CNN has displayed a photoshopped or otherwise doctored photo of the Umpqua Community College killer, showing him looking very ‘Caucasian.’ And there are the skeptics on the right who say that there’s no evidence CNN published such a photo, or displayed it on a newscast, citing lack of evidence.

If they had used such a photo, surely it could have been scrubbed when necessary, just as with the online social media presence of the shooter appears to have been? And if someone out there had screen-capped the photo would that constitute credible proof for the skeptics?

The indisputable fact is that if the ”mainstream” media did such a thing, it would hardly be the first time, nor would it be the last.

I don’t know who captioned the above shot of CNN’s Anderson Cooper, but the caption is dead on. CNN, the accused in this episode of apparent manipulation, is one of the most biased of a very biased bunch of  ‘journalistic’ outlets, surpassed possibly by MSNBC.

So we don’t know, with 100 percent certainty if this doctored photo of Harper-Mercer (or Mercer or Harper or whatever) is CNN’s work:

 If the photo is a hoax, as some on the right say, what would be the motive? To damage the credibility of CNN or the ”mainstream” media? To impugn their integrity? Really? What integrity? What credibility?
The ”mainstream” media, we know, deliberately deceives when it comes to matters racial. I’ve already mentioned the egregious George Zimmerman case, in which they kept telling us he was ”White”, despite having Latino (Indio) ancestry as well as some African ancestry some generations back, per reports. The photos of Zimmerman the media kept using either were given a reddish saturation to give him a very unconvincing ruddy complexion, or they were lightened to give him a White-ish look. The doctored photo on the right, above, is scarcely more convincing than the Zimmerman bleach job; the photo portrays someone who looks more albino, like some albino blacks I have met. Despite the deliberate narrowing of the nose and nostrils (and lips) on the photo to the right. the features suggest African ancestry to me, especially the prognathic look of the jaw.

Contrary to what the official orthodoxy tells us, race is not just about skin color. It is more than skin deep. It goes to skeletal structure, head shape, length of arm and leg bones, shape of the pelvis, shape of the feet, and more. That’s why forensic pathologists or anthropologists can assign a race to skeletal remains.

How stupid do the media deceivers take us for?
Very stupid, apparently. But they will need more than crude Photoshop skills to misrepresent someone’s race. It is not a social construct, but a construct of nature — or God. And yet they work (with some success, I’m afraid to say) at blurring racial categories, making the average White American very confused as to race and ethnicity. They’ve got a good percentage of people believing that race “does not exist.”

Hoax or genuine? CNN guilty of visual deception (or an attempt, at least, to deceive), or innocent, and framed? I don’t know.

But here are just a few things we all know:

1. The media, perhaps under orders from, or in concert with, the authorities, deliberately omit race in descriptions of crime suspects being sought by police. They risk public safety in favor of political correctness.

2. The media, verbally and visually, made obvious attempts to deceive the public about race in the George Zimmerman story. They never recanted their lies and admitted their deceptions.

3. The media deliberately stack the deck on racial issues, presenting only one side of the story, never the White side. They deliberately hire disproportionate numbers of racial and ethnic minorities to report the news, and present the biased and often outright false ‘reporting’ as indisputable fact, allowing no counter-argument or refutation.

4. The media/powers-that-be hound and harass those who stray from the approved party line on race and all matters touching on race — mass immigration, for example, and exclude such dissenters from any discussion.

Maybe we’ll learn in the next day or so whether CNN doctored that clumsily Whitewashed photo above or maybe we won’t. We do know that CNN and its counterparts (including Fox) are dishonest to the core when it comes to race. We know that they have deceived the gullible masses — but as the saying goes, ‘fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.’ And the media have a long history of obfuscating, concealing, misleading, deceiving, and out-and-out, barefaced lying to us. So if they are proven ‘innocent’ in this particular case, that does not make them credible or trustworthy.

The edifice of lies

The Umpqua Community College killings are getting everyone’s attention at the moment, it seems.

The first reports I heard — from a friend, actually, rather than from the Mendacious Media, had the shooter assumed to be a White male — of course. And someone said that the location of the incident — in small-town Oregon — would almost rule out a non-white perpetrator. This is absurd, as Oregon is now a very “diverse and vibrant” state, what with massive illegal immigration of Latinos, and then there’s the fact that in whatever college, no matter how small or obscure it may be, there are the inevitable foreign students, either children of immigrants or recent arrivals as ‘refugees’ or whatever from Moslem countries. In the past, immigrants tended to concentrate in urban areas, and mostly near the coasts. Seldom did they exist in any numbers in small towns. Now this is no longer the case. Even small towns, in heartland America, are ”blessed” with diversity.

And of course the killer was not a ‘White guy’, nor is he even American-born, apparently.

The media narrative is that it’s about guns, or about the poor shooter’s mental health ”issues”. For the Free Republic crowd, the thing that matters above all is his apparent Islamic background. But nobody in the media will address the apparent anti-Christian motive he had — asking his victims their religion, then shooting in the head those who said ‘Christian’. And nobody will mention the factor (almost always present in these mass  shooting) of psychoactive drugs. Why? Maybe because psychology and psychiatry and their pharmaceutical panaceas are sacred cows in our post-Christian society. Psychiatrists and psychologists are our high priests now, and there will be an army of such ‘experts’ all over the 24-hour propaganda news channels over the next few days. And they will spout the usual drivel about his childhood, his rootlessness, his ‘broken home’, and given his mixed racial background, probably ‘racism’ will be the main culprit for the way he turned out. It was not his fault. He was ‘hurting inside’. The common wisdom says that anyone who commits a heinous act of violence must be ‘hurting inside’, poor baby.

The regular conservatives will say he was a mixed-up kid who was radicalized by Islam. And maybe there is some truth in that. But above all few people will note the racial angle, unless there are claims that he was a victim of ‘racist’ Whites.

These shootings always follow a predictable pattern. And yet nothing seems to be learned from them. All that results is more clamor from the left for the banning of private gun ownership, repealing the Second Amendment.

Whether the powers-that-be, including their Media mouthpieces, just opportunistically exploit these shootings to eat away at support for the Second Amendment, or whether these incidents are somehow engineered-to-order, as some people assert, the fact is, the System
benefits from such atrocities. They are viewed mostly as opportunities by the left, in order to frighten the easily panicked portion of the population or to wear down the uninformed middle-of-the-road types whose support for their Constitutional rights is lukewarm.

Anyway I expect the news to report that this Harper-Mercer guy was on some kind of antidepressants or other prescription meds, but no one will dare suggest a cause-and-effect relation, despite the multitude of such incidents in which psychoactive drugs were involved. Far too many Americans are themselves being dosed by their kindly family doctors and psychiatrists with various drugs — anti-depressants, drugs for ‘ADHD’ and so on. As long as so many Americans are using these things, nobody wants to question the safety or wisdom of taking them. And why are so many Americans so medicated? Perhaps because they have bought the post-Christian worldview in which life’s problems are due to ‘personality disorders’ or ‘mental issues’ which can be medicated out of existence.

That, again, leads to the question of why so many of us are so unhappy. Perhaps because our once-very-liveable society is breaking down. Incivility is everywhere, even in my small, mostly Christian town. Standards and morals have fallen by the wayside. Our country has been divided every which way: politically, ethnically, religiously, generationally, and by sex. Our country has been sold out from under us, as tens of millions of immigrants (legal, illegal, it matters not) and now ‘refugees’ are being seeded even in our rural areas and small backwater towns. Unemployment is high, and our ‘experts’ and officials lie to us about it.

Of course we are not a happy, contented nation. Medications keep many people zombie-like, stifling their normal feelings, flattening their emotions and responses, so I’ve been told by people who are chronic users of anti-depressants. This suits the powers-that-be, I’m sure. It’s made us a passive, though discontented, people.

And if there is such a thing as ‘illness of the mind’ (mental illness) it is that mindset called ‘liberalism’ or ‘progressvisim’ or whatever you may call it, which causes people to live within a lie, an elaborate false world, in which all people are the same; race does not exist. A world in which everybody can and must live in multiracial communities and pretend their differences don’t exist. A world in which women are just as good as men at being warriors, police officers, firefighters, and even prison guards. A world in which ‘male’ and ‘female’ are social constructs, along with race, and anyone can decide he/she is of the opposite sex and force the rest of us to affirm their delusion.

Because the ideologues who are in control in this country is so insane, there is no chance that they can solve the insoluble problems which they themselves have created. The ‘mental illness’ called egalitarianism/liberalism/progressivism led us to this situation with the Chris Harper-Mercers running amok, (and the Chris Monforts, the Colin Fergusons, and all the rest). Banning guns will not help. Apparently the ‘surveillance state’ couldn’t even use their mountains of data to stop the Tsarnaev brothers, or the Fort Hood killer, though they had enough information to do so.

So what good is all that data they gather on all of us? How does it make us safer?

Above all there is this ever-present racial issue which touches on all the important problems of our time: not just black/White conflicts, but mass immigration and the ‘refugee’ Camp-of-the-Saints scenario in Europe.

And it cannot, and will not, be addressed honestly as long as those who control the narrative stay in control.

When will the whole edifice of lies come down?